This might be objected to on performance grounds, but it doesn't actually cost that much more, since the bulk of the work happens in the leaves of the tree.
#Backtrack define series
The idea is you're doing this to perform some kind of depth-first tree search.īut you could do it instead as a series of "stabs" down from the root of the tree, following a different path each time you "stab". I have done something like it in C/C++ in a way that preserves the "prettiness" but doesn't actually run backwards. To do it in a normal compiler language like C++ is incredibly hairy. I've done it via macros in LISP, and it works well. If A wants to "fail" and start "running backward" it simply returns without calling the function that calls B. So when A is finished executing, before returning it calls its argument that executes B. Second, whenever you have a sequence of statements like A B, you make A a function, and you pass to it a function capable of executing B. OK, so if that idea has appeal, how do you do it?įirst, you need a kind of statement representing a choice, where a move is chosen, that you can "back up" to and revise your choice. You could just think of this as searching a tree, but if the move choices are complicated it may be more intuitive to think of it as a program "backing up" to the last place it chose a move, choosing a different move, and running forward again. If either program gets to a "bad place" it wants to back out and try another move. If the initial program gets to a "good place" it wants to say "Yay" and carry out the first move it made. When the program wants to make a move, it picks a move, then switches to its mirror-image opponent program, which picks a move, and so on. This is useful when writing a program to play a game like chess, where you want to look ahead some number of moves. When using backtrack, a program appears to be able to run backward. If routine A calls A, or if A calls B and B calls A, that is recursion.īacktrack is not an algorithm, it is a control structure.
#Backtrack define code
Your piece of code is simply recursion, as you never get back if the result doesn't fit your goal. If you end up at the root with no options left, there are no good leaves to be found." If you run out of options, revoke the choice that got you here, and try another choice at that node. You can backtrack to continue the search for a good leaf by revoking your most recent choice, and trying out the next option in that set of options. At each node, beginning with the root, you choose one of its children to move to, and you keep this up until you get to a leaf. "Conceptually, you start at the root of a tree the tree probably has some good leaves and some bad leaves, though it may be that the leaves are all good or all bad. In backtracking you use recursion in order to explore all the possibilities until you get the best result for the problem.Ĭan be a bit hard to understand, I attach some text from here: In recursion function calls itself until reaches a base case. That question is like asking what's the difference between a car and a DeLorean.
0 kommentar(er)
